In a similar incident, the Canadian authorities called Clearview AI's activities illegal, as per The New York Times, stating that the company needed its citizens' consent to use their biometric information. The Australia's information commissioner and privacy commissioner directed Clearview AI to stop collecting facial data of Australian citizens and delete the existing data after finding that Clearview AI had breached the Australian Privacy Act, reported TechCrunch. The Greek privacy authority also fined Clearview AI €20 million for violating parts of Europe's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), as per The Record. The data protection agency also fined Clearview €20 million for the breaches of EU law.īleeping Computer further noted that the French authorities fined Clearview AI €20 million for illegally collecting and processing faceprints of French citizens. ![]() Italy's data protection agency instructed Clearview AI to delete facial biometrics of Italian citizens and banned it for further processing of faceprints of the citizens, as reported by TechCrunch. Considering the world's current population (around 8 billion), it could have about four images of each person in the world.īut the biggest concern is that the images resting in Clearview's database have been scooped up from social media, YouTube, and various online platforms secretly without the consent of users. The company claims to have more than 30 billion images in its database. The BBC reported that the founder of Clearview AI said the company has run one million searches for the US police department. Clearview mobile app for on-the-go users.Ĭlearview AI clients include, as mentioned in a BuzzFeed report, The Justice Department, Walmart, FBI, Homeland Security, and more.Consent-based API for commercial markets.Web-based facial recognition service for law enforcement agencies.You will also see links where those public photos appeared.Īccording to the Clearview AI website, the company provides the following solutions: You upload a picture of a person, and Clearview AI will show you public photos of that person. The municipality had argued that the deployment along a thoroughfare crowded with nightclubs and experiencing an elevated crime rate was necessary to identify criminals.Clearview AI is an American company offering facial recognition technology to its clients. ![]() In addition to declaring the system illegal, the NAIH has fined the technical service provider HUF 500,000 (approximately US$1,400). The 39-camera system was deployed under a joint-controllership agreement that lacked data security protections, according to the NAIH, which also ruled the deployment did not satisfy the necessity and proportionality requirements under the law. The watchdog ordered the company to delete data relating to people in Italy and banned it from further collection and processing of information there. The National Authority for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (NAIH) of Hungary has declared a municipal CCTV system with facial recognition, CMS Law-Now writes. Just a few weeks ago, the company’s technology was cited as a “particularly dangerous” example of facial recognition by a group of U.S. This is not the first time Clearview AI comes under scrutiny for alleged violations of privacy laws. In response to these measures, the company blocked trial access to its software from European IP addresses.Ĭlearview CEO Hoan Ton-That writes in a response that the company has no footprint or customers in the country or even in the EU, that it is therefore not subject to GDPR, and that he is “heartbroken by the misinterpretation by some in Italy” of the company’s technology. ![]() Together with the hefty fine, Clearview AI was also ordered to erase the data collected from individuals in Italy and banned the company from further collection and processing of the data through the company’s facial recognition system.įinally, the GPDP urged Clearview AI to designate a representative in the EU to facilitate the exercise of data-related legal matters in future. The GPDP rejected these arguments, however, and the ruling that followed established that the company infringed several fundamental principles of the EU’s GDPR including transparency, purpose limitation and storage limitation. Clearview’s defense against the probe was that the company was conducting testing to support a rollout of its service in the Italian market that had already been concluded by March 2020.Ĭlearview AI also tried to distinguish between biometric data scraping and person monitoring, and they denied using behavioral analysis or any profiling techniques.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |